Archive - LEGO®
Choose an alternative in the category
LEGO®
1,799
Results
Building Set - 201 pieces, recommended for ages 7-14 years
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO70901
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10727
Building Set - 58 pieces, recommended age: 4 - 7 years
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10726
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10725
Building Set - 614 pieces, recommended age: 4 - 7 years
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10724
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10723
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10722
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10720
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO2304
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10580
Building Set - 65 pieces, recommended age: 1.5 - 5 years
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10572
Building Set - 65 pieces, recommended age: 1.5 - 5
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10571
Building Set - 143 pieces, recommended age: 4-7 years
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10747
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10746
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10740
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10734
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO10728
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO70908
Building Set - 460 pieces, recommended age: 8 - 14 years
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO70907
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO70900
Building Set - 759 pieces, recommended for ages 8 to 14 years
Discontinued
Order Code:
EULO76054
Discontinued
Order Code:
LO1530
Discontinued
Order Code:
LO1529
Building Set - 460 pieces, recommended age: 8 - 14 years
Discontinued
Order Code:
LO1528
Archive - LEGO®
LEGO® has been making children and adults happy since 1949. At that time, father and son Ole and Godtfred Christiansen created the first LEGO® brick. But they weren't successful right away. Discover how their journey began, and what products they offer today!
Was this information useful?
This form is used only for evaluating the information in the description above.
If you have any question about our products, services, transport or any other request, please contact our customer support.
If you have any question about our products, services, transport or any other request, please contact our customer support.
What should be improved? Is anything missing here? Is anything wrong? Share it with us.